Как же сегодня без Мюллера.

[cjelli]

С одной стороны, конгрессмен Ратклифф по делу:
“Can you give an example other than Donald Trump where the Justice Department determined an investigated person was not exonerated because their innocence was not conclusively determined?” Texas Republican Rep. John Ratcliffe asked Mueller.

“I cannot, but this is a unique situation," Mueller replied.

Ratcliffe shot back: “The special counsel’s job didn’t say you were to determine Trump’s innocence or to exonerate him.” He added: “Respectfully, it was not the special counsel’s job to conclusively determine Trump’s innocence.”

С другой стороны, профессура изнемогает от TDS (профессор права в UMich, бывший федеральный прокурор(!)):

The politics of this are frustrating. Let’s focus on the substance - Mueller found that Russia attacked America, Trump helped and then lied to cover it up. Mueller could not charge a sitting president with a crime. The process for addressing presidential misconduct is impeachment

Вот как такое может преподавать юриспруденцию?

Comments

[yankel]

Ну, если профессура с кистенями бегает по демонтрациям...